Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 01.07.2025 09:05

Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Why, after a divorce, would one still want to ruin the other one’s life?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Russia can stop this any time.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Dinosaurs Had More Than Just Teeth—They Had Cancer, and It’s Changing Everything - The Daily Galaxy
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
AMD Stock Soars as Piper Sandler Raises Price Target After 'Advancing AI' Event - Investopedia
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
Any day of the week — including Sundays.
What is BookTok and why is it so popular?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Neuroscientists just discovered a fascinating fact about the grooves in your brain - PsyPost
Thank you.
What’s next?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Is it possible to become homeless after being released from jail or prison in the United States?
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
The Louvre, the world’s most-visited museum, shuts down to sound the alarm on mass tourism - PBS
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.